Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Central European Celts |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 200 BC - 101 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetradrachm (1) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Stylized beardless head facing right, adorned with a pearl diadem rendered as a prominent row of raised pellets sweeping across the crown. The facial features are rendered in the characteristic abstracted Celtic manner, with a schematic eye, rounded cheek, and simplified neck. The hair is depicted as a bold cascade of pellets and flowing locks, reflecting the La Tène artistic tradition of dissolving naturalistic forms into ornamental elements. The field is plain and unlettered. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (200 BC - 101 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The "Slowakischer Typ" tetradrachms are a loose regional grouping of late La Tène coinage produced in the Carpathian basin, most likely by Celtic populations in what is now western Slovakia and adjacent Moravia. They derive ultimately from the Macedonian tetradrachms of Philip II, though the prototypes had passed through so many generations of copying by this point that the chain of stylistic transmission is more typological inference than documented lineage.
Göbl's classification of the type remains the working reference, though attribution to a specific tribe is impossible with current evidence — no hoard provenance has conclusively tied this emission to a single issuing group.