Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Dacian tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A highly stylised rider on horseback depicted in a prancing or rearing posture, moving to the left, executed in the degenerate Celto-Dacian tradition derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachm prototypes. The horse's body is rendered with bold, simplified modelling, with individual legs clearly articulated and a flowing tail to the right. The rider, shown in schematic form, appears seated atop the horse with a rounded head and vestigial body elements. The field is plain, with no legend, inscription, or exergual line, consistent with this uninscribed tribal issue. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (300 BC - 201 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Dacian silver coinage of this period derived almost entirely from imitations of Macedonian tetradrachms, with Philip II's issues serving as the primary template. The so-called Dickschrötling — thick flan — variants represent a regional divergence from that model, where Dacian celators progressively abstracted the original types across generations of copying until the designs became schematic to the point of near-unrecognizability. Attribution to specific tribal groups remains genuinely contested; the Kostial and Göbl references reflect decades of scholarly disagreement rather than settled consensus.
The thick flan format itself suggests deliberate weight standardization outside Greek norms, possibly reflecting local exchange conventions among Carpathian communities not bound to Aegean monetary practice.