Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Apollokopf-Dickschrötling Type

Uitgever Uncertain Dacian tribes
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetradrachm (4)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A highly stylised rider on horseback depicted in a prancing or rearing posture, moving to the left, executed in the degenerate Celto-Dacian tradition derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachm prototypes. The horse's body is rendered with bold, simplified modelling, with individual legs clearly articulated and a flowing tail to the right. The rider, shown in schematic form, appears seated atop the horse with a rounded head and vestigial body elements. The field is plain, with no legend, inscription, or exergual line, consistent with this uninscribed tribal issue.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Dacian silver coinage of this period derived almost entirely from imitations of Macedonian tetradrachms, with Philip II's issues serving as the primary template. The so-called Dickschrötling — thick flan — variants represent a regional divergence from that model, where Dacian celators progressively abstracted the original types across generations of copying until the designs became schematic to the point of near-unrecognizability. Attribution to specific tribal groups remains genuinely contested; the Kostial and Göbl references reflect decades of scholarly disagreement rather than settled consensus.

The thick flan format itself suggests deliberate weight standardization outside Greek norms, possibly reflecting local exchange conventions among Carpathian communities not bound to Aegean monetary practice.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT