Katalog
Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos
oder mit E-Mail registrieren
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
Tetradrachm Apollokopf-Dickschrötling Type
| Emittent | Uncertain Dacian tribes |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | A highly stylised rider on horseback depicted in a prancing or rearing posture, moving to the left, executed in the degenerate Celto-Dacian tradition derived from Philip II of Macedon tetradrachm prototypes. The horse's body is rendered with bold, simplified modelling, with individual legs clearly articulated and a flowing tail to the right. The rider, shown in schematic form, appears seated atop the horse with a rounded head and vestigial body elements. The field is plain, with no legend, inscription, or exergual line, consistent with this uninscribed tribal issue. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | ND (300 BC - 201 BC) |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Dacian silver coinage of this period derived almost entirely from imitations of Macedonian tetradrachms, with Philip II's issues serving as the primary template. The so-called Dickschrötling — thick flan — variants represent a regional divergence from that model, where Dacian celators progressively abstracted the original types across generations of copying until the designs became schematic to the point of near-unrecognizability. Attribution to specific tribal groups remains genuinely contested; the Kostial and Göbl references reflect decades of scholarly disagreement rather than settled consensus.
The thick flan format itself suggests deliberate weight standardization outside Greek norms, possibly reflecting local exchange conventions among Carpathian communities not bound to Aegean monetary practice.