Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1840 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Dollar (1785-date) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Nine-month post-dated promissory note of Series D, issued September 9, 1840, with a central letterpress vignette of a seated allegorical figure flanked by two large oval counters bearing the numeral "5" at the upper corners and a large "V" at the lower right. The lower half carries the printed promise-to-pay text in bold display letterpress type, reading "FIVE DOLLARS," with the issuer's full title above. Two manuscript signatures of the Clerk and President appear beneath the printed text. |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenlegende | Blank |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company was a perpetually cash-strapped enterprise, and by 1840 it had been issuing scrip for years to meet payroll and contractor obligations along the still-incomplete waterway. These notes functioned as a local currency of necessity rather than any formal banking instrument — the company had no charter to issue money and operated in a legal grey zone that Maryland authorities largely tolerated because the alternative was construction stoppage.
Francis Thomas, whose signature appears here, was a Maryland congressman at the time. His presence on canal paper reflects how deeply the project was entangled with state and federal political patronage.