カタログ
Tetradrachm - Anonymous Bronze, 1 Crescent
| 発行体 | Lihyanite Kingdom (Northern Arabia) |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 200 BC - 24 BC |
| 種類 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 額面 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 通貨 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 材質 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 重量 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 直径 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 厚さ | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 形状 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 製造技法 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 向き | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 彫刻師 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 流通終了年 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 参考文献 | Huth#40 cat#Cf. 284948 |
| 表面の説明 | Highly stylized and schematically rendered bust of Athena facing right, executed in a provincial imitative style derived from Athenian tetradrachm prototypes. The helmet is depicted in simplified, almost abstract linear form, with curved crested contours visible above the head. A single crescent symbol appears on the cheek below the eye, serving as a distinguishing control mark or regional attribute. The facial features are rendered in bold, shallow relief characteristic of local Arabian die-cutting traditions. The overall composition reflects the progressive abstraction of the Athenian type as it was adapted by Lihyanite moneyers. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 表面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の説明 | An owl stands to the right with head turned to face the viewer, rendered in a schematic imitative style derived from the classical Athenian tetradrachm reverse type. An olive sprig appears to the left of the owl, referencing the canonical Athenian composition. The Greek letters ΘΕ appear to the right of the owl in the field, serving as an ethnic abbreviation or control mark. The design reflects a local Lihyanite interpretation of the Athenian owl motif, with simplified relief and provincial die-cutting characteristic of Northern Arabian imitative coinage. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 縁 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造所 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造数 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 追加情報 |
The Lihyanite kingdom, centered at Dedan in the Hejaz, operated as a successor polity to the earlier Minaean trading presence in northwestern Arabia. Their coinage is poorly understood and rarely appears in Western collections — most examples surface through the Arabian Peninsula antiquities market with little provenance documentation. The anonymous attribution reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty: no ruler's name has been securely linked to this type, and the chronological spread of nearly two centuries in the assigned date range signals how much work remains.