Katalog
| Emittent | Lihyanite Kingdom (Northern Arabia) |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 200 BC - 24 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Highly stylized and schematically rendered bust of Athena facing right, executed in a provincial imitative style derived from Athenian tetradrachm prototypes. The helmet is depicted in simplified, almost abstract linear form, with curved crested contours visible above the head. A single crescent symbol appears on the cheek below the eye, serving as a distinguishing control mark or regional attribute. The facial features are rendered in bold, shallow relief characteristic of local Arabian die-cutting traditions. The overall composition reflects the progressive abstraction of the Athenian type as it was adapted by Lihyanite moneyers. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | ND (200 BC - 24 BC) - Owl facing - ND (200 BC - 24 BC) - Owl right, only head facing - |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Lihyanite kingdom, centered at Dedan in the Hejaz, operated as a successor polity to the earlier Minaean trading presence in northwestern Arabia. Their coinage is poorly understood and rarely appears in Western collections — most examples surface through the Arabian Peninsula antiquities market with little provenance documentation. The anonymous attribution reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty: no ruler's name has been securely linked to this type, and the chronological spread of nearly two centuries in the assigned date range signals how much work remains.