Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Hemidrachm

Uitgever Leukas
Jaar 470 BC - 450 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Archaic female head in right profile, likely representing Aphrodite or a local nymph, set within a shallow incuse square. The hair is rendered in a knotted chignon at the nape, with tightly crimped or waved locks framing the face in the severe archaic manner. The facial features are finely engraved with a straight nose and strong jaw characteristic of early fifth-century BC Greek coinage. The field is plain and no legend or inscription appears.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Leukas
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Leukas occupied an unusual constitutional position among Corinthian colonies — functioning as a dependent polis that nonetheless struck its own coinage, something Corinth permitted selectively and for reasons that remain debated. These hemidrachms circulated alongside the dominant Corinthian stater system in the northwest Greek maritime corridor, where Leukas served as a critical waypoint between the Corinthian Gulf and the Ionian Sea. The BCD Akarnania reference citing a variety suggests die differences from the Copenhagen specimen, likely reflecting multiple short-lived die pairs rather than any organized series.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT