目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 1612 - May not exist - 1616 - Castle of Kampen - 1616 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1616 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1616 - Lily - 1617 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1617 - Lily - 1618 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1618 - Lily - 1619 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1619 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1619 - Lily + mintmark Deventer - 1622 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1622 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1628 - Lily - 1632 - Lily - 1633 - Lily - 1634 - Lily - |
| 附加信息 |
Overijssel's 2 Stivers occupied an awkward moment in Dutch monetary history — the Union of Utrecht had federated the provinces in 1579, but coinage remained stubbornly provincial for decades afterward, with each issuer maintaining its own types and often its own fineness standards. The result was a circulation nightmare of incompatible small silver that merchants and moneychangers navigated through published exchange tables rather than face value.
The .583 fineness here places this below the purity levels of competing provincial issues, a deliberate cost-cutting measure that other provinces periodically complained about to the States General.