Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Overijssel, Province of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1612-1634 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Silver (.583) |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | 1612 - May not exist - 1616 - Castle of Kampen - 1616 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1616 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1616 - Lily - 1617 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1617 - Lily - 1618 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1618 - Lily - 1619 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1619 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1619 - Lily + mintmark Deventer - 1622 - Coat of arms of Overijssel - 1622 - Coat of arms of Zwolle - 1628 - Lily - 1632 - Lily - 1633 - Lily - 1634 - Lily - |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Overijssel's 2 Stivers occupied an awkward moment in Dutch monetary history — the Union of Utrecht had federated the provinces in 1579, but coinage remained stubbornly provincial for decades afterward, with each issuer maintaining its own types and often its own fineness standards. The result was a circulation nightmare of incompatible small silver that merchants and moneychangers navigated through published exchange tables rather than face value.
The .583 fineness here places this below the purity levels of competing provincial issues, a deliberate cost-cutting measure that other provinces periodically complained about to the States General.