Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
100 Pounds
| Uitgever | Central Bank of Egypt |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 2000-2014 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 100 Pounds |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | The Great Sphinx of Giza is rendered at the centre against a multicolour guilloche underprint in teal, green, and ochre tones. The denomination and issuer inscriptions appear in both English and Arabic around the central vignette, with ornamental borders framing the composition. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | 06.09.2000 - 30.01.2001 / 07.09.2000 - narrow value in watermark (note: so far as I know and see, no value at all is discernible) |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Egypt's 100 Pound notes of this series were printed by the state-owned printing authority, the Postal Printing House in Cairo — one of relatively few countries that handles its own high-denomination production entirely in-house. The security thread specification for this issue has caused persistent collector confusion: the catalog records a narrow-value watermark thread for the September 2000 signature, but this feature is widely reported as either absent or undetectable in practice, possibly reflecting a printing variation or a cataloging error carried forward from earlier documentation.
Worth examining against strong transmitted light before attributing a signature variety.