Catalog
| Issuer | Goths from Taman |
|---|---|
| Year | 275-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Denarius (late 3rd/early 4th centuries) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Winged figure standing facing, rendered in a schematic barbaric style, with outstretched wings formed by diagonal strokes extending to either side. A circular annulet is placed to the lower left and another to the lower right of the central figure, flanking the feet. A partial degenerate legend or pseudo-inscription runs along the upper periphery of the field. The composition imitates late Roman reverse types but is strongly abstracted, consistent with Gothic imitative denarii of the Taman region. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The so-called "Goths from Taman" issues remain among the least understood barbarous coinages of the late Roman periphery. Produced somewhere in the Taman Peninsula region — the ancient Tmutarakan area bridging the Kuban steppe and the eastern Crimea — these billon pieces circulated among Gothic groups who had settled around the Cimmerian Bosporus following the great migrations of the mid-third century. The striking authority was almost certainly not a state in any formal sense, but rather a tribal or mercantile arrangement piggybacking on the prestige of Roman denominations.
The fifty-year date range reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty, not imprecision in record-keeping.