Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

1 Denarius Circle, circle

Emittent Goths from Taman
Jahr 275-325
Typ Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Billon
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägetechnik Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Highly stylized, barbaric effigy facing right, rendered in a degenerate provincial style derived from late Roman imperial prototypes. The head is surrounded by an elaborate arrangement of curved, flame-like or foliate elements radiating outward, occupying the entire field. The lower portion features a cluster of pellets suggesting a chin or neck detail. The overall workmanship reflects a strongly abstracted, non-Classical artistic tradition characteristic of Gothic imitative coinage.
Aversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Averslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage ND (275-325)
Zusätzliche Informationen

The so-called "Goths from Taman" issues remain among the least understood barbarous coinages of the late Roman periphery. Produced somewhere in the Taman Peninsula region — the ancient Tmutarakan area bridging the Kuban steppe and the eastern Crimea — these billon pieces circulated among Gothic groups who had settled around the Cimmerian Bosporus following the great migrations of the mid-third century. The striking authority was almost certainly not a state in any formal sense, but rather a tribal or mercantile arrangement piggybacking on the prestige of Roman denominations.

The fifty-year date range reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty, not imprecision in record-keeping.