Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm In the name of Alexander III

Uitgever Uncertain Greek city (Greece (ancient))
Jaar 310 BC - 290 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetradrachm (4)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned left on a low backless throne, his body draped from the waist, holding an eagle with wings spread on his extended right hand and a long sceptre upright in his left hand. The legend ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ runs downward along the right field. An astragalos (knucklebone) appears as a control symbol in the left field, serving as a mint or magistrate identifier. The composition follows the canonical Alexandrine reverse type established at the royal mint.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Price 1 is the opening entry in Martin Price's 1991 corpus of Alexander-type tetradrachms — a cataloguing landmark that attempted to organize thousands of dies across dozens of mints spanning Alexander's lifetime and the subsequent decades of Diadochi rivalry. The "uncertain" attribution reflects genuine scholarly disagreement; these early posthumous issues were struck by multiple competing successors who deliberately retained Alexander's types to assert continuity of authority rather than advertise their own claims.

Lifetime versus early posthumous attribution for this date range remains contested. The distinction matters considerably for valuation.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT