Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Paisa - Ranjit Singh
| Uitgever | Ratlam, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1871 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | 20 mm |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Central field features a katar (dagger) depicted in relief, flanked by Nagari script legend reading 'Ratlam' above. The design is enclosed within a beaded inner border, surrounded by a plain outer border. The overall style is characteristic of late princely-state hammered copper coinage. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Devanagari |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Ratlam was among the smaller Rajput states in Malwa, nominally subordinate to the British Crown after the 1818 treaty arrangements that brought most of central India under indirect imperial control. By 1871, princely states retained the right to issue copper token coinage for local circulation, though silver and gold had long been ceded to British mints. The "Ranjit Singh" attribution in the series name references the local ruling lineage rather than the Sikh Maharaja of Punjab — a point of persistent confusion in catalog literature.
KM#22.2 distinguishes this from the .1 variety by die characteristics documented in the Pridmore reference on Indian princely issues.