Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Talschaft of Uri |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1617-1622 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | 7.62 g |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Full-length frontal effigy of Saint Martin of Tours vested in episcopal pontificals, wearing a mitre and holding a crozier in his left hand, set within a rope-bordered inner circle. The saint is depicted in a hieratic, stylized manner characteristic of early seventeenth-century Swiss hammered coinage. The surrounding circular Latin legend identifies him as bishop and patron saint. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | SANCT·MARTIN·EPISCO: |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Uri was the smallest of the original Swiss forest cantons, yet it maintained its own coinage rights fiercely. The Dicken series of this period was struck at a moment when the canton's strategic position controlling the Saint Gotthard Pass gave it outsized political leverage relative to its population — that pass was the most direct Alpine route between northern Europe and Italy, and the revenue it generated funded exactly these kinds of sovereignty-asserting monetary issues.
Production across the 1617–1622 window was sporadic rather than continuous, tied to intermittent arrangements with neighboring minting facilities rather than a permanent cantonal mint.