Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Melitaia |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 375 BC - 325 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Chalkon (1⁄48) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A bee depicted facing upward with wings fully outstretched, occupying the central field in a naturalistic yet stylized rendering typical of Thessalian civic bronzes. The ethnic legend of Melitaia is divided into four Greek letters arranged around the bee: Μ and Ε above to the left and right respectively, and Λ and Ι below to the left and right. The composition is well-centered within the irregular flan, with no border ornament visible. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (375 BC - 325 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Melitaia was a small Thessalian polis in the Enipeus valley, a member of the Thessalian League whose coinage output was modest enough that even well-documented series remain sparsely represented in major collections. The BCD Thessaly II corpus — assembled by the collector known only as BCD whose Thessalian holdings were dispersed at auction by Nomos in 2011 — remains the primary reference precisely because institutional coverage is so thin.
Rogers #396 places this type within a tight chronological bracket that coincides with Thessaly's turbulent relationship with the Macedonian expansion under Philip II.