Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Antoninianus - Maximianus PAXX AVGG, Pax

Uitgever Roman Imperial Mint
Jaar 289-293
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Antoninianus, Reform of Caracalla (AD 215 – 301)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Latin
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde The personification of Pax (Peace) stands erect facing left in the central field, rendered in a stylized, elongated manner consistent with late third-century Roman die cutting. She holds an olive branch extended in her right hand and a transverse sceptre or long vertical staff in her left. The surrounding legend reads PAX AVGG, proclaiming the peace of the two Augusti (Maximianus and Diocletian). Mint marks in the exergue, which vary by emission, identify the Siscia officina responsible for striking, with recorded variants including B, C, S, and (rev. C). The reverse is framed by a beaded border, partially visible through the heavy green patination.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The PAXX AVGG reverse — a deliberate misspelling or scribal error for PAX AVGG — appears on a subset of Maximianus issues and has generated debate among specialists as to whether it reflects a die-cutter's mistake that slipped through workshop quality control or a deliberate regional variant. The Diocletianic mints of this period ran under considerable production pressure following the establishment of the Tetrarchic system, and engraving errors of this kind were not systematically corrected once a die entered rotation.

RIC V.2 398C distinguishes this specifically from the corrected legend type.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT