Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

50 Pfennig

Uitgever Gemeinde Stecklenberg (Municipality of Stecklenberg)
Jaar 1921-1927
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Paper
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde NOTGELD der STECKLENBERG i. OSTHARZ
50 Pfennig
STECKLENBERG
den 1 Juli 1921
Gültig bis Aufruf
der Gemeinde-
Vorstand:
Weißenborn
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Dorfteich in Stecklenberg
50
50
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Stecklenberg is a village in the Harz district of Saxony-Anhalt, and its decision to issue Notgeld in 1921 was entirely practical — chronic coin shortages following the First World War left small municipalities scrambling to facilitate everyday local commerce. The Gemeinde had neither a bank nor significant industry behind it, just a local administrative stamp and whoever Weißenborn was, signing on behalf of the parish council.

The series running through 1927 is notably late. Most municipal Notgeld had been withdrawn and demonetized well before that point, as Rentenmark stabilization in late 1923 restored functioning national currency. A 50 Pfennig note circulating into 1927 from a village this size warrants scrutiny — whether it remained legally current or simply stayed in local use by habit is an open question the issuing records don't cleanly resolve.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT