Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

5 Pfennig Dyrotz; PoW Camp

Uitgever Gefangenen-Lager Dyrotz (Prisoner of War Camp Dyrotz)
Jaar 1915-1918
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Paper
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Gefangenen-Lager DYROTZ
GUTSCHEIN
FÜNF 5 PFENNIG
Wer diesen Schein nachmacht oder verfälscht oder Fälschungen verausgabt,wird strafrechtlich verfolgt.
Kein öffentliches Zahlungsmittel.
(Translation: Prisoner Camp Dyrotz
Coupon Five 5 Pfennigs
Anyone who copies or falsifies this certificate or issues counterfeits will be prosecuted. No public means of payment.)
Beschrijving keerzijde Light green guilloche underprint with black letterpress border and text. A violet oval handstamp is applied to the center, overlapping the printed text. The printer's imprint appears at the lower margin: BUCHDRUCKEREI OTTO LANGE, BERLIN S 42.
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Dyrotz was a POW camp located near Wustermark in Brandenburg, one of dozens of German camps that issued their own internal scrip during the First World War to prevent captured currency from funding escapes or entering the broader economy. The Otto Lange press in Berlin handled a number of these camp issues, and the workmanship is competent rather than elaborate — the real security lay in the dry stamp and handstamp applied at the camp itself, which varied enough between issues to make forgery impractical for a prisoner with limited materials.

The handstamp in particular is the detail worth examining closely on any example. Unevenly applied impressions are normal; a missing or faint stamp is not necessarily a sign of damage but often reflects hasty issue under administrative pressure.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT