Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

2 Units - Aspurgus

Uitgever Bosporan Kingdom
Jaar 9 BC - 13 AD
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Anokhin#1381, MacDonald#272, Bosporos#291
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Caduceus depicted upright in the center of the field, with two intertwined serpents rising to a winged top, rendered in a schematic hammered style. To the left of the caduceus appears the Greek letter Β (beta), serving as a mark of value denoting 2 units. The device is contained within a plain circular border. The field is otherwise bare, with no additional legend or inscription.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Β
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Aspurgus ruled the Bosporan Kingdom as a client of Rome, having secured his position partly through direct appeal to Augustus — a political calculation that kept the kingdom nominally independent while firmly within the Roman orbit. His coinage reflects this balancing act: a local bronze issue serving a Greek-speaking trading population on the northern Black Sea littoral, where Bosporan merchants regularly handled both Roman and Parthian goods. The 2-unit denomination circulated alongside larger issues in a system that had been largely stable since the Spartocid dynasty.

Anokhin 1381 and MacDonald 272 align closely on attribution, though Bosporos 291 reflects minor typological distinctions some specialists consider die-linked to transitional issues of the late Augustan period.