Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

2 Falus - Moulay Sulayman ND type, without mint name, Seal of Solomon and Ornamental design

Uitgever Morocco
Jaar 1792-1822
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Hammered/Cast Coinage (1659-1882)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Seal of Solomon (six-pointed star or hexagram) prominently depicted in the central field, formed by two interlaced triangles in low relief, with a small raised central boss at the intersection point. The star is set within a plain field on an irregular flan typical of cast Moroccan bronze coinage of the early 19th century. No legends, mint name, or date are present.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (1792-1822) - Eustache# 657
Aanvullende informatie

Moulay Sulayman's reign was defined by deliberate isolation — he closed Moroccan ports to most foreign trade, suppressed the Atlantic commercial routes his predecessors had cultivated, and turned sharply inward. The bronze falus coinage of his period reflects this: issues without mint names were common, partly because centralized minting authority was frequently contested by regional power structures, and partly because attribution was simply not a priority for small-denomination circulation coinage.

The absence of a mint name on Eustache 657 makes precise attribution to Fez, Marrakesh, or any other facility effectively impossible without die-linkage studies.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT