Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

16 Gute Groschen

Uitgever Goslar, City of
Jaar 1674-1675
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Imperial eagle displayed with wings spread, head turned to the left, rendered in bold relief against an unadorned field. The eagle's plumage is elaborately detailed with feathered wings outstretched in heraldic fashion. Below the eagle, a small oval cartouche bears the fractional denomination '2/3', indicating two-thirds of a Thaler. The circular legend reads MONETA CIVITATIS, identifying this as the coinage of the city of Goslar. The coin's milled border frames the design with a fine toothed edge.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde MONETA CIVITATIS
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Goslar's mining economy was already in steep decline by the 1670s, the Rammelsberg silver deposits that had funded imperial ambitions for centuries increasingly exhausted. This issue almost certainly reflects a last effort to assert municipal coining rights at a moment when the city's fiscal independence was under sustained pressure from Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.

The two-year span of 1674–1675 suggests limited production, likely tied to a single contract with a local wardein rather than sustained mint operation.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT