Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
100 lei Fondul Social
| Uitgever | Cooperativa de Consum (Romanian Consumer Cooperative) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1952-1965 |
| Type | Pattern or trial banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | COOPERATIVA DE CONSUM LEI 100 LEI PARTICIPAȚIE LA CONSTITUIREA FONDULUI SOCIAL VALOARE NOMINALĂ UNA SUTĂ LEI |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Plain yellow field with green guilloche borders at top and bottom, the upper border featuring a repeating geometric zigzag pattern. Text is arranged in ruled lines for handwritten completion of member details, with a small ornamental guilloche vignette at centre. Spaces are provided for the cooperative name, member card number, issue date, and signatures of the President and Chief Accountant. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Romanian consumer cooperatives issued their own internal scrip throughout the communist period, functioning as a parallel exchange medium within the cooperative retail network rather than as state legal tender. These "Fondul Social" notes — Social Fund notes — were tied to cooperative membership contributions and could be redeemed against goods or services within the system, effectively binding workers to cooperative commerce rather than open-market spending.
The thirteen-year span of this issue without design change reflects the rigid standardization imposed on cooperative institutions under Gheorghiu-Dej's administration. Attribution of exact print runs remains difficult; Romanian cooperative scrip was poorly documented compared to National Bank emissions, and survival rates are low partly because members had strong incentive to spend rather than hold them.