Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Cooperativa de Consum (Romanian Consumer Cooperative) |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1952-1965 |
| Typ | Pattern or trial banknote |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | COOPERATIVA DE CONSUM LEI 100 LEI PARTICIPAȚIE LA CONSTITUIREA FONDULUI SOCIAL VALOARE NOMINALĂ UNA SUTĂ LEI |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Plain yellow field with green guilloche borders at top and bottom, the upper border featuring a repeating geometric zigzag pattern. Text is arranged in ruled lines for handwritten completion of member details, with a small ornamental guilloche vignette at centre. Spaces are provided for the cooperative name, member card number, issue date, and signatures of the President and Chief Accountant. |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
Romanian consumer cooperatives issued their own internal scrip throughout the communist period, functioning as a parallel exchange medium within the cooperative retail network rather than as state legal tender. These "Fondul Social" notes — Social Fund notes — were tied to cooperative membership contributions and could be redeemed against goods or services within the system, effectively binding workers to cooperative commerce rather than open-market spending.
The thirteen-year span of this issue without design change reflects the rigid standardization imposed on cooperative institutions under Gheorghiu-Dej's administration. Attribution of exact print runs remains difficult; Romanian cooperative scrip was poorly documented compared to National Bank emissions, and survival rates are low partly because members had strong incentive to spend rather than hold them.