Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Paisa - Ranjit Singh
| Uitgever | Ratlam, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1885 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Centrally positioned multi-line legend filling the field, rendered in Devanagari script with the state name and date incorporated within the inscription. The flan is irregularly struck with slightly uneven edges, characteristic of provincial Indian copper coinage of the period. The lettering is bold and raised, occupying the majority of the coin's surface without a formal border or decorative frame. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | RUTLAM 1885 |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Ratlam was a small Rajput princely state in Malwa whose coinage often lagged decades behind its nominal dates. The attribution to Ranjit Singh here is conventional — the state's copper issues from this period were struck with considerable irregularity, and die workmanship at the local mint was crude enough that many pieces circulate among collectors under disputed attributions. KM#23 is among the more straightforwardly assigned types, but the 1885 dating reflects regal rather than Gregorian convention.