Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | United Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1794 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1/2 Penny (1⁄480) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | BUNGAY HALFPENNY BIGOD`S CASTLE |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | 1794 - DH#22 - plain edge - 1794 - DH#22a - PAYABLE AT BIRMINGHAM LONDON OR BRISTOL - 1794 - DH#22b - PAYABLE X AT X CRONEBANE X OR * IN * DUBLIN X * X - 1794 - DH#22c - PAYABLE IN DUBLIN OR LONDON - 1794 - DH#22d - PAYABLE IN LANCASTER LONDON OR BRISTOL - 1794 - DH#22e - engrailed edge - 1794 - DH#22f - milled edge - |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Bungay's halfpenny token was issued during the great provincial token boom of the 1790s, when a chronic government shortage of small regal copper left traders across Britain effectively minting their own change. The Bungay piece is attributed to a local tradesman issue rather than a single identified merchant, making it more civic in character than most Suffolk tokens of the period. Dalton & Hamer's numbering places it firmly within the documented Suffolk series, and Atkins' earlier cataloguing aligns — a rare consistency between the two standard references that occasionally diverge on Suffolk attributions.