Katalog
| Emittent | Panchala Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 45-65 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Karshapana (150 BC to 125 AC and 300 AC to 350 AC) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Central field features a seated deity or royal figure in frontal or three-quarter pose, rendered in low relief in the characteristic punch-marked style of the Panchala series. The figure is depicted in a stylized, hieratic manner typical of early Indian copper coinage, with limbs suggested by incised lines. Surrounding the central motif are additional punch-marked symbols within an irregular circular flan. The overall design reflects the provincial artistic conventions of the Panchala Kingdom during the early centuries of the Common Era. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Brahmi |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Panchala kingdom, centered in the upper Gangetic plain roughly between the Ganges and the hills of what is now western Uttar Pradesh, issued a long sequence of copper punch-marked and cast coinages across several dynasties. Indramitra's placement within the Panchala sequence is reconstructed almost entirely through hoard stratigraphy and die-linkage studies — no inscription or epigraphic source confirms his reign dates independently. Gupta's corpus remains the primary reference for attributing these issues, and the numbering reflects a classification built on typological rather than documentary evidence.