Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Ustrushana, Principality of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 601-725 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 1.83 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Facing bust of a ruler depicted frontally in the field, wearing an elaborate stepped crown or headdress adorned with a crescent and pellet ornament at the apex. The face is rendered in a schematic but expressive style characteristic of Central Asian coinage of the early medieval period, with large almond-shaped eyes, a broad nose, and a prominent chin. The bust is framed by a beaded border around the coin's periphery. The overall style reflects the Sogdian artistic tradition prevalent in the Ustrushana principality during the 7th–early 8th century. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Sogdian |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Ustrushana occupied the Zeravshan valley north of Sogdia, a minor but strategically positioned principality that maintained its own bronze coinage well into the Islamic period. The Rakhanch type — named for the local rulers' title rather than a place — belongs to a poorly documented sequence that Smirnova catalogued only partially; Zeimal left this specific variant unnumbered, meaning it fell outside even his systematic attempt to impose order on the chaotic pre-Islamic bronzes of Central Asia. The absence of a cross distinguishes it from the commoner variant and likely signals a different phase of production or a separate issuing authority within the principality's fractured administrative structure.