Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Ustrushana, Principality of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 601-725 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | 1.83 g |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Facing bust of a ruler depicted frontally in the field, wearing an elaborate stepped crown or headdress adorned with a crescent and pellet ornament at the apex. The face is rendered in a schematic but expressive style characteristic of Central Asian coinage of the early medieval period, with large almond-shaped eyes, a broad nose, and a prominent chin. The bust is framed by a beaded border around the coin's periphery. The overall style reflects the Sogdian artistic tradition prevalent in the Ustrushana principality during the 7th–early 8th century. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Sogdian |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Ustrushana occupied the Zeravshan valley north of Sogdia, a minor but strategically positioned principality that maintained its own bronze coinage well into the Islamic period. The Rakhanch type — named for the local rulers' title rather than a place — belongs to a poorly documented sequence that Smirnova catalogued only partially; Zeimal left this specific variant unnumbered, meaning it fell outside even his systematic attempt to impose order on the chaotic pre-Islamic bronzes of Central Asia. The absence of a cross distinguishes it from the commoner variant and likely signals a different phase of production or a separate issuing authority within the principality's fractured administrative structure.