Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Unknown Æ Bukhara Sogd

Uitgever Bukhara Sogd
Jaar 650-725
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Zeimal#23, Smirnova#1372
Beschrijving voorzijde Crudely struck obverse depicting a rider on horseback facing right, rendered in a schematic, archaic style typical of early Sogdian coinage. The horse and rider are shown in profile with minimal detail, characteristic of the hammered bronze issues of the Bukhara Sogd region. The flan is irregular and slightly worn, with a rough, pitted surface. The design occupies the central field with no visible border or legend on this side.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Bukhara Sogd coinage of this period occupies one of the more contested zones in Central Asian numismatics — the region was shifting under sustained Arab pressure following the initial Islamic conquests east of the Oxus, and local Sogdian lords continued striking their own bronze issues in a kind of administrative defiance that lasted decades into the occupation. Zeimal's classification work, built substantially on Soviet-era excavation finds, remains the primary framework for sorting these types, though attribution of individual specimens is frequently disputed among specialists.

Smirnova 1372 places this among issues traceable to the Bukhar-Khudats, the semi-autonomous rulers who persisted well into the Umayyad period.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT