Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Bukhara Sogd |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 650-725 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Zeimal#23, Smirnova#1372 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Crudely struck obverse depicting a rider on horseback facing right, rendered in a schematic, archaic style typical of early Sogdian coinage. The horse and rider are shown in profile with minimal detail, characteristic of the hammered bronze issues of the Bukhara Sogd region. The flan is irregular and slightly worn, with a rough, pitted surface. The design occupies the central field with no visible border or legend on this side. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Bukhara Sogd coinage of this period occupies one of the more contested zones in Central Asian numismatics — the region was shifting under sustained Arab pressure following the initial Islamic conquests east of the Oxus, and local Sogdian lords continued striking their own bronze issues in a kind of administrative defiance that lasted decades into the occupation. Zeimal's classification work, built substantially on Soviet-era excavation finds, remains the primary framework for sorting these types, though attribution of individual specimens is frequently disputed among specialists.
Smirnova 1372 places this among issues traceable to the Bukhar-Khudats, the semi-autonomous rulers who persisted well into the Umayyad period.