See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Unknown Æ

Issuer Uncertain city of Central Italy
Year 301 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A four-spoked wheel occupying the central field, the spokes meeting at a raised central hub and extending to a plain outer rim. The design is boldly cast with heavy, slightly irregular spokes, a motif commonly associated with Central Italic aes grave and related cast bronze coinage of the 3rd century BC. The field is otherwise plain, with no legend or additional devices. The rim is slightly raised and uneven, consistent with the casting technique employed.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The attribution "uncertain city of Central Italy" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — these bronzes circulate through the literature under shifting assignments, with Haeberlin, Thurlow-Vecchi, and Sydenham each offering different candidate mints without consensus. The third century BC saw numerous small Oscan, Umbrian, and Latin communities issuing independent bronze coinage before Roman monetary integration progressively absorbed or eliminated local traditions.

ICC#321 places this piece within a loose typological grouping rather than a firm civic attribution.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE