Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Unknown Æ

Uitgever Uncertain city of Central Italy
Jaar 301 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Facing male head, considerably more worn and less distinct than the obverse, again presented frontally and filling the field. The facial features — eyes, nose, and mouth — are discernible though heavily degraded, rendered in the same archaic, schematic style as the obverse. The surrounding field is plain and unadorned, with no legend or additional devices visible, consistent with the anepigraphic character typical of uncertain Central Italian bronze issues of this era.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (301 BC - 201 BC) - Only 2 examples known
Aanvullende informatie

Central Italian bronze issues of this period existed in a fragmented monetary environment where dozens of small communities produced anonymous coinage independently, often before — or in deliberate resistance to — absorption into the Roman monetary orbit. Attribution remains contested precisely because so many of these mints operated briefly, left no literary record, and struck without consistent iconographic programs. Haeberlin's work on aes grave remains the foundational reference, though his attributions at p.172 have been challenged and revised repeatedly in the century since publication.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT