Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Chalukya dynasty (Indian Hindu Dynasties) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 900-1200 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Irregularly shaped U-form gold fanam bearing three punch marks applied to the surface: a boar (varaha) moving to the right, a conch shell (shankha), and a Kannada legend reading 'Sangama'. The boar device is a dynastic emblem closely associated with the Chalukya royal lineage, while the conch shell is an auspicious Vaishnava symbol. The punch marks are distributed across the flat, organically formed gold strip, which has been bent into a characteristic U-shape prior to or during striking. The overall execution is typical of South Indian primitive fanam coinage of the medieval period. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (900-1200) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The fanam was the workhorse denomination of medieval South Indian commerce, struck by an almost bewildering range of dynasties, feudatories, and local chiefs — which is precisely the identification problem this piece presents. The "Sangama" attribution is a later scholarly convenience; contemporaries would have recognized these by the issuing authority's symbol, not its dynastic name. Distinguishing genuine Chalukya issues from those of their numerous subordinate chiefs relies almost entirely on subtle die characteristics that remain incompletely catalogued.