Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Philip III Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 101 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Heavily Celticised and stylistically degraded head of Herakles facing right, derived from the Macedonian prototype of Philip III. The facial features are rendered in a highly abstract Celtic idiom, with the characteristic lionskin headdress reduced to a schematic ornamental motif at the crown. The flan is irregular and slightly cupped, consistent with barbarian hammered coinage of the eastern Celtic tradition. Surface details are worn but sufficient to identify the type.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Celtic copies of the Macedonian tetradrachm of Philip III proliferated across the Danube basin and Carpathian regions for roughly two centuries, produced by tribes who valued the coins as bullion and prestige objects rather than as tools of administered exchange. The prototypes circulated into Celtic territory through mercenary payments — tens of thousands of Celts served in Hellenistic armies from the early third century onward — and local die-cutters progressively abstracted the original imagery across successive generations of copying until the prototype became almost unrecognizable.

Attribution to a specific tribe remains genuinely difficult. The Kostial and Göbl references place this type within a broad eastern grouping, but the minting authority is unknown and may never be resolved.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT