See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Philip III Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 101 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Drachm
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Heavily Celticised and stylistically degraded head of Herakles facing right, derived from the Macedonian prototype of Philip III. The facial features are rendered in a highly abstract Celtic idiom, with the characteristic lionskin headdress reduced to a schematic ornamental motif at the crown. The flan is irregular and slightly cupped, consistent with barbarian hammered coinage of the eastern Celtic tradition. Surface details are worn but sufficient to identify the type.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Celtic copies of the Macedonian tetradrachm of Philip III proliferated across the Danube basin and Carpathian regions for roughly two centuries, produced by tribes who valued the coins as bullion and prestige objects rather than as tools of administered exchange. The prototypes circulated into Celtic territory through mercenary payments — tens of thousands of Celts served in Hellenistic armies from the early third century onward — and local die-cutters progressively abstracted the original imagery across successive generations of copying until the prototype became almost unrecognizable.

Attribution to a specific tribe remains genuinely difficult. The Kostial and Göbl references place this type within a broad eastern grouping, but the minting authority is unknown and may never be resolved.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE