Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Lysimachoskopf Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 200 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetradrachm (4)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Nude male rider on horseback prancing to the left, rendered in a stylized Celtic manner derived from the seated Zeus prototype of the Macedonian tetradrachm tradition. The horse is depicted with schematized musculature, elongated limbs reduced to angular strokes, and a striated mane. The rider raises one arm, with a disembodied head or mask motif visible above and behind the horse, a hallmark feature of this Eastern Celtic Lysimachos-derived series. A small oval or pellet device appears beneath the horse in the lower field. The overall composition reflects the progressive abstraction characteristic of late Celtic coinage in the Carpathian-Danubian region.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain, irregular
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Celtic imitations of the Lysimachos tetradrachm circulated across the Danube basin and Carpathian regions for well over a century, progressively abstracting the original Macedonian prototype into forms that bear only skeletal resemblance to their source. This particular type sits within a broad classificatory cluster — Göbl's Pl. 24 series — representing workshops that were likely operating in what is now eastern Hungary, Slovakia, or Romania, though attribution remains genuinely contested among specialists.

The dating range reflects the problem rather than resolves it: these coins were struck across multiple generations, probably by tribal groups with no continuous institutional mint. Stylistic drift within a single die sequence can be dramatic.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT