Каталог
| Эмитент | Uncertain Dacian tribes |
|---|---|
| Год | 275 BC - 201 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Валюта | Drachm |
| Состав | Silver |
| Вес | 12.95 g |
| Диаметр | |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | Kostial#537 |
| Описание аверса | Facing head of Apollo. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | Horseman riding left; circle of pellets (wreath) above, branch below. |
| Письменность реверса | |
| Надписи реверса | |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (275 BC - 201 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6834606990 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This Tetradrachm, the Apollokopf Type, was issued by uncertain Dacian tribes between 275 BC and 201 BC. It belongs to a broad category of "barbarian" imitations of Hellenistic coinage, primarily Macedonian types. Its production signifies growing economic sophistication and cultural interaction between Greek city-states and tribes north of the Danube. These coins facilitated trade, tribute, and served as symbols of emerging tribal power during regional flux.
Artistry: The coin’s artistry reflects a blend of Hellenistic influence and indigenous interpretation. The engraver is anonymous, but the design clearly adapts Greek prototypes, particularly the head of Apollo on the obverse. This depiction, derived from a classical model, is rendered in a distinct "barbarized" style. Characterized by simplification, bolder lines, and a more abstract interpretation, it showcases a unique stylistic evolution. The reverse often features a stylized chariot or rider.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this example weighs 12.95 grams, indicative of a local or reduced weight standard compared to the full Attic tetradrachm. For grading, key high-points on the obverse include Apollo's hair, forehead, and facial features. Dacian imitations frequently exhibit variable strike quality, including off-centering, die wear, and flan irregularities. A strong strike would show clear definition of the stylized elements, particularly Apollo's expressive features, and minimal planchet flaws.