Catalog
Tetradrachm
| Issuer | Dacians of Banat |
|---|---|
| Year | 300 BC - 101 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Stylized laureate head of Zeus facing right, rendered in the Celtic-Dacian barbarous imitative tradition derived from Macedonian prototypes. The deeply engraved hair falls in thick, schematized waves from beneath the wreath, with the beard rendered as bold, curvilinear strokes. The portrait is set within a beaded border, occupying virtually the entire flan. The overall treatment reflects a progressive abstraction of the original Hellenistic model, characteristic of Banat Celtic-Dacian coinage. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Dacian tetradrachms of Banat were struck not by a centralized mint but through a loose tribal production system, with individual workshops producing dies of wildly varying quality across several generations. These coins are Celtic-influenced imitations of Macedonian prototypes — specifically Philip II tetradrachms — that were adopted, adapted, and progressively abstracted by Dacian craftsmen until the original Macedonian types became nearly unrecognizable. The degradation was not incompetence; it reflects deliberate local reinterpretation over roughly two centuries of use.
No hoard evidence firmly ties these to a single issuing authority within Banat, and attribution to "the Dacians" remains a geographic convenience rather than a political certainty.