Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Entella |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 320 BC - 300 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Tetradrachm (20) |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Horse's head facing left, depicted in three-quarter view within a shallow incuse circle, rendered with considerable naturalism and vigour characteristic of Punic-Sicilian coinage. A palm branch or grain stalk curves along the right side of the field, a motif associated with Carthaginian military coinage. In the lower exergual area, a Phoenician inscription appears as a legend identifying the issuing authority of Entella under Campanian or Punic administration. |
| Reversschrift | Phoenician |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Entella was a Sicel town in the interior of Sicily that fell under Campanian mercenary control in the late fifth century BC — soldiers who had been hired by Dionysios I of Syracuse and then simply refused to leave. This coin was struck by those Campanian occupiers, who maintained a degree of civic identity distinct from their Syracusan patrons. The Jenkins sequence places this piece within a closely studied die-linked group, and the HGC attribution reflects how recently this series was properly systematized; earlier scholarship had misassigned much of it.