Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Stater with hand

Uitgever Pictones
Jaar 100 BC - 50 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Hammered
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A charioteer depicted to the right, holding a wreath or crown aloft, guiding an androcephalic horse — a horse with a human head — also facing right, a hallmark motif of Armorican and western Gaulish coinage traditions. Beneath the horse in the lower field, a prominent open hand is depicted, serving as the distinguishing type element of this issue. The composition is rendered in a dynamic, stylized La Tène manner with angular and curvilinear detailing throughout.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (100 BC - 50 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

The Pictones were a Gaulish tribe settled along the Atlantic coast of what is now the Poitou-Charonne region, and their coinage circulated during a period of intensifying Roman pressure that would culminate in Caesar's Gallic Wars. Electrum staters of this type are among the more distinct issues from western Gaul, and the hand motif has been interpreted by scholars variously as a votive symbol, a tribal marker, or an import from Armorican iconographic traditions — no consensus holds.

LT#4395 in the Latour corpus places this type firmly within the Pictonian attribution, though earlier catalogers disputed it.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT