Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Stater - Uncertain dynast

Uitgever Lycia, Dynasts of
Jaar 500 BC - 480 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter 18 mm
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Deep square incuse punch divided by eight raised ridges radiating from a central boss, forming a multi-pointed star or wheel pattern within the sunken compartment. The incuse square is sharply defined with slightly raised borders, typical of early hammered coinage produced in western Asia Minor and Lycia during the late Archaic period. The design is entirely geometric and devoid of inscription or figural imagery, representing the standard reverse type of early Lycian dynastic staters. The incuse technique reflects the influence of East Greek minting practice.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (500 BC - 480 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Lycian dynastic coinage of the early fifth century predates the region's fuller integration into Achaemenid administrative structures, and these early staters are among the most difficult to attribute — the dynastic sequence for this period remains contested, with some scholars folding several "uncertain" issues into the orbit of Kuprlli or his predecessors based on coin-typology alone. Müseler's ongoing work has progressively tightened attributions, but the earliest bracket remains genuinely unresolved.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT