Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

Pfennig Undetermined Friesach marks

Emittent Duchy of Carinthia (Austrian States)
Jahr 1200
Typ Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Round (irregular)
Prägetechnik Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Averslegende AoSoSV[...]EpI
Reversbeschreibung Central device consisting of a prominent patriarchal or archiepiscopal cross flanked by subsidiary design elements, surrounded by a beaded inner border. The cross is rendered in bold relief with a globular or annulet element at its center, consistent with the heraldic vocabulary of Carinthian ecclesiastical coinage of circa 1200. Diagonal cross-hatched or star-like ornaments fill the quadrants surrounding the central motif. The outer field is bounded by a raised irregular rim formed by the hammered flan edge, with no legible legend on this side.
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Zusätzliche Informationen

Friesach pfennigs — the broad, thin bracteate-style denars struck in Carinthia from the late twelfth century — became the dominant trade currency across the eastern Alpine region for well over a century, circulating from the Adriatic coast into Hungary and the Balkans. The Archbishop of Salzburg and the Duke of Carinthia contested minting rights in the region repeatedly, and many surviving pieces resist clean attribution precisely because multiple authorities copied each other's types without scruple.

The "undetermined" classification here is honest: Luschin himself acknowledged that distinguishing ducal from episcopal issues within this type group often requires die-linkage studies rather than typology alone.