Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Pfennig - Ulrich I

Uitgever Duchy of Carinthia (Austrian States)
Jaar 1135-1144
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter 19 mm
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Full-length effigy of a bearded duke in profile facing left, depicted in a stylized Romanesque manner. The figure holds a sword upright in his right hand and a banner lance in his left, emblematic of ducal authority. The design is executed in low relief typical of early medieval hammered coinage, with linear stylization of the robes and facial features.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (1135-1144)
Aanvullende informatie

Ulrich I of Carinthia ruled the duchy during a period of intense rivalry between the Babenberg and Spanheim dynasties for influence over the southeastern Alpine territories. His coinage falls within the broader Pfennig tradition of the German-speaking lands, where regional lords exercised minting rights with considerable independence from imperial oversight — a privilege that Carinthian dukes had held intermittently since the late tenth century. The CNA Cb4 attribution places this piece within a tightly sequenced die study, and attribution disputes for Carinthian bracteate-adjacent issues from this decade remain active among specialists.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT