| Issuer | Kent, Kingdom of |
|---|---|
| Year | 822-823 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Penny (1⁄240) |
| Currency | Pound |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 1.54 g |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | Sp#878, North#221/2 |
| Obverse description | Diademed bust in style of Baldred right within inner circle, legend around. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering |
+SVVEFHERD MONETA (Translation: Svehferd, moneyer.) |
| Reverse description | Mint name across three lines. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering |
.DOROB ERNIA C IVITAS (Translation: City of Canterbury.) |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (822-823) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1494593470 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This silver penny, struck at an anonymous Canterbury mint between 822 and 823, encapsulates a pivotal period for the Kingdom of Kent. During this time, Kent was under increasing Mercian suzerainty, culminating in its conquest by Egbert of Wessex in 825. The anonymity likely reflects Mercian control over Kentish coinage or instability preceding Wessex annexation, where direct royal attribution was less stable. It represents a late example of distinct Kentish monetary production.
Artistry: Lacking a specific moneyer, the artistry adheres to prevailing Anglo-Saxon numismatic styles of the early 9th century. Coins of this type (Sp#878, North#221/2) typically feature a central cross or monogram on the obverse, often encircled by a legend detailing the mint, such as 'DOROB' or 'CANT'. The reverse frequently presented a similar cruciform design or a simpler central motif. The engraving, though anonymous, aimed for legibility and symbolic clarity, characteristic of the period's insular art.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a silver flan weighing 1.54 grams, this penny exhibits typical technical challenges of early medieval minting. High-points susceptible to wear include central elements of cruciform designs or the highest relief points of a potential bust. Common technical issues include off-centre strikes, irregular flan shapes, and variable strike pressure, leading to areas of weakness, particularly towards the coin's periphery. A well-struck example would show crisp legends and a fully formed central device.