Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Obol - Shao Alkhano Type 67A, unknown mint

Uitgever Alchon Huns
Jaar
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Silver
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A highly degenerate rendering of a fire altar flanked by two attendants, derived ultimately from Sasanian reverse iconography. The altar is represented by a vertical central element surmounted by a crescent-like arc of concentric ridged lines, while the two flanking figures are reduced to bold, swirling globular masses suggesting faces or busts in extreme stylization. A beaded border is partially visible along the flan's surviving edge. The entire composition is severely schematized, consistent with the barbarous coinage conventions of the Alchon Hun obol series as catalogued under Göbl EM type 67A.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Rough
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Alchon Huns displaced the Kidarites across Gandhara and the Punjab from roughly the late 4th century onward, and their coinage reflects that transition — a deliberate appropriation of existing monetary conventions to ease absorption into established trade networks. The obol denomination itself was inherited from earlier Kushano-Sasanian practice rather than invented by the Alchons.

At 0.21 g, individual dies for fractions this small were often shared across mints or recut extensively, which makes mint attribution for type 67A genuinely uncertain rather than merely undocumented.