Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Obol Kinnloser Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 200 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht 0.88 g
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Celticised laureate head facing right, rendered in a stylised barbarian interpretation of Hellenistic prototypes. The hair is depicted with bold, schematic strokes, and the laurel wreath is suggested by a row of pellets or beaded ornament along the crown. The facial features are heavily abstracted, with a prominent nose and simplified eye, characteristic of Eastern Celtic engraving traditions. The flan is irregular and the design fills the field without a border legend.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "Kinnloser" designation — German for "chinless" — refers to a specific facial rendering that defines this obol type within the broad and poorly-documented spectrum of Eastern Celtic silver fractions. Attribution remains contested; the issuing group is unresolved, and the two-century date range reflects how little is known about the precise political or tribal context of production. These small silver fractions circulated alongside larger units in the Danube basin region, likely serving local exchange rather than any interregional trade function. Göbl's classification remains the primary anchor for organizing these types, though die studies have not advanced far enough to resolve questions of mint sequence.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT