Katalog
| İhraççı | Larissa Phrikonis |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 300 BC - 200 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Obol (⅙) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Silver |
| Ağırlık | 0.79 g |
| Çap | 9.5 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Laureate head of Apollo facing right |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Eagle, with spread wings, flying upward, with head facing left. A club to the lower left and inscription divided by the eagle. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | ΛΑΡΙ ΣΑΙΟΝ |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (300 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 7910666650 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This silver Obol was issued by Larissa, a significant Thessalian city-state, during the Hellenistic period (300-200 BC). Larissa was famed for its fertile lands and excellent horses, often featured on its coinage. The "Phrikonis" epithet likely denotes a specific cult or minting authority, distinguishing this issue. As a fractional denomination, the Obol was crucial for daily transactions, supporting local commerce in a metal-based economy.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical of ancient Greek coinage. Its style aligns with the Hellenistic artistic tradition. Larissa's obols commonly feature the nymph Larissa's head, often with flowing hair, on the obverse. The reverse consistently portrays a horse, a direct homage to Thessaly's equestrian heritage. The "Phrikonis" variant likely maintains these core iconographic elements, possibly with minor symbolic distinctions reinforcing civic identity.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 9.5mm flan, weighing 0.79g, this Obol's technical strike quality is often inconsistent, typical for small ancient denominations. High-points prone to wear or weak strike include the nymph's hair and facial features, and the horse's mane, musculature, and hooves. Desirable examples feature a well-centered strike and clear rendering of main devices; off-center strikes and partial impressions are common due to minting challenges.