Obol

発行体 Kleitor
年号 460 BC - 430 BC
種類 Standard circulation coin
額面 Obol (⅙)
通貨 Drachm
材質 Silver
重量 0.92 g
直径 8.0 mm
厚さ
形状 Round (irregular)
製造技法 Hammered, Incuse
向き
彫刻師
流通終了年
参考文献 BCD Peloponnesos#1416
表面の説明 Forepart of bridled horse right
表面の文字体系
表面の銘文
裏面の説明 Mill-sail incuse
裏面の文字体系
裏面の銘文
鋳造所
鋳造数 ND (460 BC - 430 BC) - -
Numisquare ID 7050103710
追加情報

Historical Context: This silver obol, issued by the Arcadian city of Kleitor between 460 BC and 430 BC, situates itself firmly within the Classical period of ancient Greece. During this era, Kleitor, like many smaller Peloponnesian city-states, maintained its autonomy amidst the burgeoning influence of larger powers such as Sparta and Athens. The issuance of this diminutive denomination underscores the city's need for localized currency to facilitate daily economic transactions, reflecting a vibrant, albeit regional, economy. Such coinage provides invaluable insight into the monetary systems and political independence of lesser-known poleis navigating a complex geopolitical landscape, particularly in the lead-up to and early stages of the Peloponnesian War.

Artistry: The artistry of this Kleitorian obol, though constrained by its minute dimensions, adheres to the stylistic conventions of the Early to High Classical period. While the engraver remains anonymous, typical for such small issues, the design likely featured a local deity or nymph. A plausible obverse would depict the head of the eponymous nymph Kleitor, facing right, rendered with the developing naturalism characteristic of the era, showcasing refined facial features and neatly styled hair. The reverse, often simpler on obols, would probably bear a local emblem or monogram, such as a K L ligature, reflecting the city's identity and minting authority.

Technical/Grading: From a technical standpoint, striking a silver coin weighing just 0.92 grams on an 8.0 mm flan presented significant challenges. Key high-points for a nymph's head would include the nose, lips, and the intricate details of the coiffure. For the reverse, the clarity of any central monogram or symbol would be crucial. Due to the rapid production methods for small change, examples exhibiting a full, well-centered strike with complete details on both sides are exceptionally rare. Common technical strike qualities often include some degree of off-centering, weakness in peripheral areas, or incomplete striking on finer design elements.

×