Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Obol

Uitgever Uncertain Philistian city
Jaar 450 BC - 333 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht 0.74 g
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde A lion couchant to right occupies the central field, rendered in the archaic Near Eastern style characteristic of Philistian coinage. Behind the lion rises a crenelated city wall featuring three distinct towers, likely a civic emblem identifying the issuing mint city. Below the lion, a series of wave patterns suggests a body of water, possibly referencing a coastal or riverine location. The composition is contained within the irregular flan typical of hammered silver issues of this period.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Philistian civic coinage of this period occupies a genuinely strange corner of ancient numismatics — these small silver fractions were struck by cities on the southern Levantine coast during the Persian satrapal period, when local authorities retained enough autonomy to mint but did so within an Athenian-influenced weight standard they had essentially borrowed wholesale. The attribution to a specific city remains contested; Gitler and Tal's classification acknowledges the uncertainty directly rather than forcing a provenance.

The reference XV.3O places this piece within a typological grouping rather than a firm civic attribution — a distinction worth noting when comparing against other cataloged Philistian material.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT